Mathematical Impossibilities

Few things are reliable in this world. But one thing that should always match is numbers. 2+2 will always equal 4. If someone tells you 2+2 equals 5, you immediately know the person is wrong.

Statisticians, Accountants, Stock Brokers, and businesses of all sorts use number to create, profit, and predict outcomes. Sometimes we have concrete numbers and can create concrete totals. Other times, we have general numbers which we use in calculations for general totals. The one thing we always know–numbers don’t lie.

One of the easiest ways to visualize this is the difference in numbers between Trump rallies and Biden events. Trump rallies were packed by thousands and thousands of people. Biden events often had more Trump supporters show up in protest than they had in Biden supporters. The media may lie about what happened at those events, they may lie about the poll numbers, but any American who saw the rallies, the boat parades, and the MAGA drags saw the numbers for themselves. They know the support for President Trump was massive while the showing for Biden lethargic and tiny. The numbers don’t lie–President Trump had enthusiasm like no other candidate in history.

The number issues go far deeper. Simply put, the numbers don’t match. Here are a few of the problems identified with the numbers:

  1. More votes than registered voters in some areas.
  2. Massive ballot dumps (100k) exclusively for Biden
  3. Many ballots with only a Presidential candidate filled in (primarily Biden and very unusual)

The Details

Election Information—How Do You Know What Is True?

As the days tick by, the tension in the nation continues to be felt everywhere. People monitor the news hoping for clues. They are anxious to know what the end result of the November 3rd, 2020 election will be. Listening to the media is like a roller coaster ride minus the thrill. Even the “ups” ... Read more

Statistical Anomalies in the Six Battleground State – Part 9

By Peter Navarro Read the Navarro Report here. The 2020 presidential election appears to feature at least four types of statistical anomalies that raise troubling questions. Table 8 illustrates the incidence of these statistical anomalies across the six battleground states. As you can see from the table, Wisconsin and Georgia are characterized by the highest ... Read more

Executive Summary – Part 1

By Peter Navarro Read the Navarro Report here. Executive Summary This report assesses the fairness and integrity of the 2020 Presidential Election by examining six dimensions of alleged election irregularities across six key battleground states. Evidence used to conduct this assessment includes more than 50 lawsuits and judicial rulings, thousands of affidavits and declarations,1testimony in ... Read more

NY Times’ Michigan Data: Massive Vote Dump at 6AM Wednesday (96% for Biden) Used To Overcome Huge Trump Lead

Source: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11/ny-times-michigan-data-massive-vote.html For the startling analysis of apparent Pennsylvania vote manipulation, please see this post. I’ve retrieved all of The New York Times’ 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Michigan’s. Below is a graph depicting the shifts in votes in Michigan ... Read more

BOOM: NY Times’ Real-Time Election Data Seems to Confirm Massive Georgia Vote Fraud, Eerily Similar to Pennsylvania’s

Source: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11/boom-ny-times-real-time-election-data.html For the startling, and eerily similar, analysis of apparent Pennsylvania vote manipulation, please see this post. I’ve retrieved all of The New York Times’ 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Georgia’s. What I found is pretty fascinating, especially because ... Read more

The New York Times’ Pennsylvania Voting Data Seems to Confirm Massive and Obvious Vote Count Manipulation for Biden

Source: http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-new-york-times-pennsylvania-voting.html I’ve retrieved all of The New York Times’ 2020 presidential datasets, which have a time-series of voting data from a company called Edison Research. Here, for instance, is Pennsylvania’s. What I found is pretty fascinating, especially in Pennsylvania. As just one example, here is a graph depicting the shifts in votes starting on ... Read more